Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage you to read through our Terms of Use before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions, but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating, and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms of Use, please complete the following short form.

Businiess name:  North Carolina Museum of Art
Review by:  citysearch c.
Review content: 
Although I don't mean to be curmudgeonly, this building is simply an abomination. This building is to house North Carolina's art collection - some truly beautiful and priceless works, an impressive collection to say the least - and it comes across as a budget building. It was, apparently, sufficient to 'expand' the museum by building a pre-fab warehouse with plexiglas ovals in the ceiling. The natural light in the building is cast at very odd angles and shapes, creating uneven lighting throughout, casting shapes and shadows across paintings, leaving many in the dark. This building was (in plans & renderings), and is (in implementation), an embarrassment to this state, a failure for the collection it contains. It is, in totality, a stark and soulless building, that demonstrates even more poignantly than the old building, that this state does not take art as something in which it is willing to invest. It is an afterthought. After visiting and spending a couple of hours looking around, I see all the familiar paintings and sculptures, but feel depressed with every one. They will be trapped in this architectural embarrassment for a long, long time. We have all been sentenced to live with this abomination until someone decides that an investment in actual museum architecture, in heavy building materials, good lighting, interesting environments, gardens, windows, etc., is both worthwhile and necessary for housing a treasured collection. Housing it in a bargain-basement container like this is a clear indication of the value that the community places on that collection. It's a tattoo of shame we as a community and a state are going to have to live with for many years to come, showing how we as a state place less emphasis on this part of our culture than almost any other state or city in the nation. That's our message, loud and clear, and that will continue to be our message until this building is torn down (or converted to self-storage units), and an actual art museum is built. The one positive comment I can offer, and offer sincerely, is that this building is so stark, soulless and from most angles purely ugly, that it is one of the few constructions that could, by contrast, force one to appreciate and enjoy the old building as a masterpiece by contrast. Cons: New Building

Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
 or  Cancel