Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Studio City Animal Hospital
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
I?ve been taking my dogs to SCAH for over seven years. I used to love them and recommended them to many people; however, I?ve become increasingly dissatisfied with the level of care they offer. Recently an incident I observed when I had my dogs in for vaccinations caused me to switch vets.\r
\r
A man with an 18 year old cat was in the waiting area. The cat was obviously quite ill, and it was plain to see that this guy adored his cat. In front of everyone in the waiting area, one of the women at the front desk announced to this guy, Greg, that although the cat had been treated there before and was now experiencing kidney failure and was in need of treatment, they were denying treatment because he had a $1,200 balance on his account from the last time the cat was ill. \r
\r
Greg said that he knew there was a balance, but that he?d been paying $50/month for the past seven months, which was all he could afford and would they please treat his cat. The lady at the desk agreed that in
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|