Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
JIM ELLIS MAZDA OF MARIETTA
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
I purchased a 2008 Mazda 6 three years ago from Jim Ellis Mazda. Now that I am considering buying a new car I decided to take my car to Carmax for an appraisal. When I got the appraisal I found out that my car had been involved in a rear end collision and the trunk had been rewelded together, also the trunk lid was not factory. The salesman at Jim Ellis Mazda failed to mention this to me. I would not have bought the car if I had known this information prior to now. This was not a used car when I purchased it. It was supposed to be a new car. I will never buy another car from Jim Ellis Mazda again. Now I wonder if this is the reason my transmission had to be replaced under warranty???
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|