It is a riot to see the gossip and assumptions made. Having know the facility when it was a concept and not even habitable, I have heard at least 4 sides of the story. IMO, there have been three failures to the business, what is the common denominator? Each person who took on managing that stable tried to help the owner out of her financial situation but due to difficulties in the business relationship had to give up. In 2004 I knew the place was doomed when the first manager quit within weeks of opening. It's too bad that the restaurant was sacrificed, even before the banks went after the stable. As far as where the horses went, they were not stolen, the bank took posession and the person who was caring for them went and bought them back.
Pros: Nice facility
Cons: location and owner
more