Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
DI Lusso
|
|
Review by:
Adam P.
|
|
Review content:
When I was ready to propose to my now wife, I went to Di Lusso because we had a friend that worked there. He highly recommended we buy a clarity enhanced stone and the one he showed us looked just as good as a regular diamond but at a very reasonable price. I have to admit that the ring looked incredible and still does but the diamond that we were sold was very different from what we shown. After questioning it we went to get it appraised from an independent appraiser. We didn't tell him the situation to avoid any bias or who sold us the diamond for that same reason. instead of an SI 1 what we were told the diamond was an I1 which is very different. Shortly there after some friends who got theirs at the same place found their diamond had a crack the length of their diamond and their SI1 also came back to be an I1. When we tried to get our money back they refused saying that we were told everything that we needed to know. We are still in the process of trying to get our money back and are taking them to court over it. In their credit, we got a $4000 discount on our diamond that came back legitimate.
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|