Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Children's Mercy South
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
GENERAL:\r
\r
Seems very competent in our simpler case (tests were normal) but made me wonder if he would have discovered any evidence to the contrary in the first place. He read the file during the appointment (typical), asked many questions but interrupted after the first few words (never get to tell him the full story), and asked more questions later that would have been answered already if he didn’t interrupt so much. His exam was thorough, but he didn’t seem to register the history I was trying hard to provide. This wasn’t a tome, just a regular history for a generally healthy child. \r
\r
BAD MOVE:\r
\r
Only watched 5 seconds of a 60-sec video of my child’s movement disorder. Child wasn’t having them that day, so it was important! Especially since witnessing it first-hand is what prompted our pediatrician to order consultation, MRI and EEG in the first place (tests Dr. D deemed unnecessary after the fact... hmmm). He also spoke so fast that had I not already read up extensively on what he was saying, I could not have kept up. I also might not have trusted his conclusions without my own research in mind, since he reached them with 30% of the data I had to offer. No clue how differently he approaches more complex cases. Slower, I hope.\r
\r
BOTTOM LINE:\r
\r
He’s a bit rude and dismissive, but then again, that doesn’t mean he’s not right. Maybe extensive experience allows him to jump quickly to a correct diagnosis, but I think he should still be more thorough in gathering history in this particularly nebulous field. If we need further consultation, I’ll go elsewhere for diligence and confirmation. After that, we’ll see.\r
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|