Rooks Sandra

Sandra Rooks allows her personal belief to taint her decsion making. She also is in violation of title term, like her comrade Hoffman who was told he could not use the term or lead the public into believing he can perform psychological evaluations. Rooks on a case she was on told a parent, who she personally dislikes, of course a female, ""that she did not have to come back"" or when asked about a equal parenting time told the female parents attorney,"" well she may come back and live in a trailer"" Therefore all children whos parents have them living in trailer should not have custody of their child, Ms. Rooks? Lastly, Ms. Rooks view is it is never appropriate to spank a child. Ms. Rooks you have to follow the Colorado statue that states that it is a parent's right to spank their child. Ms. Rooks is a Mother hater and it is so sad to see. It must be she is not a mother herself or many of the attrocity she performs against Moms would not be occuring. In another case Ms. Rooks placed the children with an abusive father. The abuse the children suffer in this case was so bad one of the children ended up in Cedar Springs. Do not allow this woman on your case as a CFI, especially if you are a woman. more

testified in court to keep children away from their psychological mother and in the care of drug addicts and domestically violent people who live off the system. Claims that if the children visit their mother, it would be mentally harmful when in fact their mother saved their life, literally, on more than one occasion. Made this decision also without ever meeting with the mother or her family and only listening to the bio dads story that he was told to say by his attorney. Which was to never mention the word ""MOM"" to the children so they wouldn't speak of their mom. Cons: unethical, biased. more